Latest legal news and updates from Diogenous Law in Cyprus. Insights on regulatory changes, corporate law, tax and legal developments.
We successfully represented a Cyprus police officer in disciplinary proceedings involving serious misconduct allegations. All charges were dismissed following a thorough defence, protecting our client’s professional standing and proving their innocence.
Our law firm successfully protected the reputation of a respected medical professional by removing libelous online content. We took swift pre-action steps and reached an effective, out-of-court resolution against both the original poster and those who republished the content.
Our law firm secured the enforcement of a €140,000 judgment plus legal interest, defending against a late challenge by the defaulting defendant. The Court agreed with our arguments and upheld the original decision. Recovery proceedings are now underway.
Our firm recovered medical equipment for Cyprus doctors after a clinic unlawfully withheld it. The court issued interim orders, and the equipment was returned to our clients.
Our firm obtained interim injunctions against a former employee in Cyprus, protecting our client’s business monopoly, clientele, and trade secrets under new procedural rules.
Our firm obtained a mandatory interim injunction for a Cyprus doctor, forcing the Health Insurance Organization to restore his contract. The court upheld our arguments and protected our client’s rights and professional reputation.
We secured an interim injunction against a Cyprus development company to protect our client’s €1 million land investment. The court halted asset disposal until the full case hearing.
Our firm secured a landmark victory in a Cyprus cross-border litigation case, successfully establishing jurisdiction over a complex dispute. Learn how we leveraged EU regulations to protect our client’s interests.
Our law firm successfully secured an interim injunction against the Bank of Cyprus, preventing the sale of two mortgaged properties worth €500,000. The Court ruled in favor of borrower protection due to key issues surrounding the validity of the mortgage and the risk of irreparable harm if sold to a third party.
